How AI Transformed Compliance for a Defense Giant: 60% Automation and $2.5M Saved

In defense, every control is auditable, every exception is recorded, and every delay has a cost. AI is no longer an experiment. It is a way to turn policy into proof, in real time, without trading away security or control.

The challenge

Compliance was manual, slow, and uneven. More than 60% of tasks required recurring human effort. Audit findings created rework and risk. Engineering time drifted into checklist work instead of delivery. In a high-stakes environment, even small errors delay releases or trigger costly remediations.

The brief

A publicly listed defense company asked Code & Conscience to modernize IT compliance while staying inside strict sovereignty requirements. The constraint set was clear. On-prem infrastructure. Air-gapped paths. Verifiable evidence at every step.

What we built

Embedded AI-native program inside the client’s environment with four pillars that linked policy to production.

1. Custom AI agents: Policy parsers mapped controls to systems and owners. Document mappers connected standards to artifacts. Real-time trackers captured who changed what, when, and why across data, training, deployment, inference, access, and overrides.

2. Automated workflows: DevOps and infra events triggered checks and approvals. High-risk changes paused for review. Low-risk changes flowed with recorded guardrails. Evidence accumulated continuously rather than at quarter end.

3. On-prem deployment: All models, logs, and secrets remained inside the client’s perimeter. Residency and custody stayed explicit. External access was not required for audits or investigations.

4. Training and upskilling: More than 100 staff learned GenAI and data-centric compliance practices. Teams adopted consistent playbooks for exceptions, rollbacks, and sign-off.

Results

• 60%+ of manual compliance tasks automated

• 70% reduction in audit-failure incidents

• 9,000+ hours saved per year through AI-enabled workflows

• $2.5M in projected annual savings from efficiency and avoided penalties

These outcomes did not come from a single tool. They came from an operating model that moved controls into the runtime and turned every change into evidence.

Why it worked

Policy met the pipeline: Controls lived where work happened, not in a binder.
Custody was clear: On-prem design kept data, logs, and keys local.
People stayed in the loop: AI handled repetition. Humans handled judgment.
Evidence was automatic: Audit trails wrote themselves and were exportable on demand.

What this proves

AI in regulated sectors does not replace compliance. It makes compliance faster, safer, and easier to verify. When designed well, AI reduces findings, protects engineers from low-value toil, and raises trust with auditors and program owners.

Architecture notes leaders care about

• Model registry as the source of truth for lineage, evaluations, and promotions

• Event schema for data approvals, feature changes, training runs, deploys, inference calls, and human overrides

• Risk tiers with gates that match the criticality of the change

• Dashboards that show precision, recall, latency, error classes, drift scores, and exception queues

• SIEM integration so security and compliance see the same evidence

A 12-week pattern you can copy

• Weeks 1–2: Map controls to systems and owners. Define event schema. Stand up the registry.

• Weeks 3–6: Instrument pipelines. Automate two high-friction checks. Light up dashboards.

• Weeks 7–10: Expand coverage to priority services. Add quarantine and rollback playbooks.

• Weeks 11–12: Run a dry-run audit. Export evidence. Close gaps. Publish the scorecard.

What to measure monthly

• Share of controls that emit runtime evidence

• Time to detect and time to remediate exceptions

• Defect and audit-finding trends by system

• Hours saved from automation and rework avoided

• Percentage of models with current evaluations and owners

Risks and how we mitigated them

False positives: Tuned thresholds, staged rollout, and weekly reviews.
Model drift: Monitors for data quality and behavior changes, with retraining on hard cases.
Change fatigue: A single scorecard and one owner per control to keep focus.
Skill gaps: Role-based training paths and recorded playbooks.

Actionable next steps

1. Pick one compliance workflow with high manual load.

2. Define a minimal event schema and connect it to your CI and infra.

3. Keep data and logs inside your perimeter for clear custody.

4. Set a goal such as 50% automation and 30% fewer findings in one quarter.

5. Publish an audit-ready export to prove it works.

Talk to Us

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)